Search for: "Reed v. State of Mississippi" Results 1 - 20 of 59
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2008, 4:48 pm
States that have killed inmates since the Supreme Court ruling in Baze v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 5:00 am by Matthew Loughran
Supreme Court inches closer to the end of its term and a decision in a Mississippi abortion law case that is expected to either limit or eliminate the precedent of Roe v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:39 pm by Eugene Volokh
Today’s Mississippi Supreme Court decision in Rice v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 3:44 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Axios – “If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:23 am
  And now Mississippi joins the growing number of courts that have said Class III medical device claims are preempted, regardless of whether the device was put to an off-label use.The case is Ledet v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:13 pm by Emily Coward
Mississippi, 481 U.S. 648 (1987) (excusing a qualified juror is reversible error); accord State v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 2008 WL 687025, at *1-2 (S.D. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Jackson, Mississippi attorney Philip Thomas on the blog Mississippi Litigation Review and Commentary Monday Morning Regulatory Review – 10/13/14: Hobby Lobby Implementation; Jumping the Gun on a Final Rule; Extended Waters of the United States; and EPA Rules to Watch – Washington, DC lawyer Lee Beck on his blog, the Federal Regulations Advisor For more of the best, check out LXBN, a complete review of the top insight and commentary across the LexBlog… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
The Tenth Circuit held that, whether viewed as compelled speech or as a content-based restriction, the restriction had to – and did – satisfy strict scrutiny: Colorado could show that it has a compelling interest, and that the restriction is narrowly tailored to satisfy that interest (Reed v Town of Gilbert 576 US 155, 164 (2015)). [read post]
11 Apr 2020, 5:16 am by Schachtman
In the massive silicosis litigation unleashed in Mississippi and Texas in the early 2000s, plaintiffs’ lawyers colluded with physicians to concoct dubious diagnoses of silicosis. [read post]